On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 06:11:26PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:01:05PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> Also, are we sure it's ok to send the messages and then send
>
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:01:05PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Also, are we sure it's ok to send the messages and then send
>> VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES with VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES clear?
>>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:01:05PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Also, are we sure it's ok to send the messages and then send
> VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES with VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES clear?
> Looks more like a violation to me
Michael S. Tsirkin writes:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Make the language about feature negotiation explicitly clear about the
>> handling of the VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES feature bit. Try and
>> avoid the sort of bug introduced in vhost.rs REPLY_ACK pr
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Make the language about feature negotiation explicitly clear about the
> handling of the VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES feature bit. Try and
> avoid the sort of bug introduced in vhost.rs REPLY_ACK processing:
>
> https://github.com/
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:50:11PM +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Make the language about feature negotiation explicitly clear about the
> handling of the VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES feature bit. Try and
> avoid the sort of bug introduced in vhost.rs REPLY_ACK processing:
>
> https://github.com/
Make the language about feature negotiation explicitly clear about the
handling of the VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES feature bit. Try and
avoid the sort of bug introduced in vhost.rs REPLY_ACK processing:
https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost/pull/24
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Cc: Jiang Liu
Mess