On Thu 16 Jan 2020 01:19:34 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 15.01.20 14:56, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> This is a bit more efficient than having to allocate and free memory
>> for each item.
>>
>> The default size (60) is enough for all the existing incompatible
>> features or the "Unknown incompatible
On 15.01.20 14:56, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> This is a bit more efficient than having to allocate and free memory
> for each item.
>
> The default size (60) is enough for all the existing incompatible
> features or the "Unknown incompatible feature" message.
That doesn’t make sense to me. The exis
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> This is a bit more efficient than having to allocate and free memory
> for each item.
>
> The default size (60) is enough for all the existing incompatible
> features or the "Unknown incompatible feature" message.
>
> Suggested-by:
On 1/15/20 2:56 PM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
This is a bit more efficient than having to allocate and free memory
for each item.
The default size (60) is enough for all the existing incompatible
features or the "Unknown incompatible feature" message.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Signed-of
This is a bit more efficient than having to allocate and free memory
for each item.
The default size (60) is enough for all the existing incompatible
features or the "Unknown incompatible feature" message.
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
Reviewed-by: Alex Benn
