On 9/11/23 18:15, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Coverity warns that "i2c_bus_busy(i2c->busses[i]) << i" might overflow
because the expression is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic and then
used in a context expecting a uint64_t.
While we are at it, introduce a PNV_I2C_MAX_BUSSES constant and check
the
On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 18:15 +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Coverity warns that "i2c_bus_busy(i2c->busses[i]) << i" might
> overflow
> because the expression is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic and then
> used in a context expecting a uint64_t.
>
> While we are at it, introduce a PNV_I2C_MAX_BUS
Coverity warns that "i2c_bus_busy(i2c->busses[i]) << i" might overflow
because the expression is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic and then
used in a context expecting a uint64_t.
While we are at it, introduce a PNV_I2C_MAX_BUSSES constant and check
the number of busses at realize time.
Fixes: Co
