On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 04:26:59PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:17:42AM +0100:
> > Great! I've already queued your fix.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Do you want to send a follow-up that updates the comment?
>
> I don't think I'd add much value at this
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:17:42AM +0100:
> Great! I've already queued your fix.
Thanks!
> Do you want to send a follow-up that updates the comment?
I don't think I'd add much value at this point, leaving it to you unless
you really would prefer me to send it.
Cheers,
--
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 23:53, Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Stefan Hajnoczi wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100:
> > > The older kernel I have installed right now is 5.16 and that can
> > > reproduce it -- I'll give my laptop some work over the weekend to test
> > > still maintained sta
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 20:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 7/5/22 7:28 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:52:31AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> >> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
> so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads,
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote on Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100:
> > The older kernel I have installed right now is 5.16 and that can
> > reproduce it -- I'll give my laptop some work over the weekend to test
> > still maintained stable branches if that's useful.
>
> Linux 5.16 contains commit 9d9
On 7/5/22 7:28 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:52:31AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
>> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads, making sure we go
through the two short reads path.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:01:37AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> sqeq.off here is the offset to read within the disk image, so obviously
> not 'nread' (the amount we just read), but as the author meant to write
> its current value incremented by the amount we just read.
>
> Normally recent ve
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:52:31AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
> > > so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads, making sure we go
> > > through the two short reads path.
> > > (Unfortunately I wasn't quite sure wh
Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 07:52:31AM +0900:
> Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
> > > so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads, making sure we go
> > > through the two short reads path.
> > > (Unfortunately I wasn't quite sure wha
Stefano Garzarella wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:49:21PM +0200:
> > so when we ask for more we issue an extra short reads, making sure we go
> > through the two short reads path.
> > (Unfortunately I wasn't quite sure what to fiddle with to issue short
> > reads in the first place, I tried cutti
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:01:37AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
sqeq.off here is the offset to read within the disk image, so obviously
not 'nread' (the amount we just read), but as the author meant to write
its current value incremented by the amount we just read.
Normally recent versions o
On 30.06.22 03:01, Dominique Martinet wrote:
sqeq.off here is the offset to read within the disk image, so obviously
not 'nread' (the amount we just read), but as the author meant to write
its current value incremented by the amount we just read.
Normally recent versions of linux will not issue
sqeq.off here is the offset to read within the disk image, so obviously
not 'nread' (the amount we just read), but as the author meant to write
its current value incremented by the amount we just read.
Normally recent versions of linux will not issue short reads,
but it can happen so we should fix
13 matches
Mail list logo