RE: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

On 4/20/21 6:06 PM, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote: > Hi Philippe, > >> The plan is to drop the nanoMIPS disassembler because it is broken >> since more than 2 years and nobody ever cared to fix it after >> Stefan's attempt in Nov 2018: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg576504.ht

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

On 4/20/21 6:06 PM, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote: > Hi Philippe, > >> The plan is to drop the nanoMIPS disassembler because it is broken >> since more than 2 years and nobody ever cared to fix it after Stefan's >> attempt in Nov 2018: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg576504.html

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

Hi Philippe, > The plan is to drop the nanoMIPS disassembler because it is broken > since more than 2 years and nobody ever cared to fix it after Stefan's > attempt in Nov 2018: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg576504.html > So it is certainly unused. Unused unmaintained cod

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

Hi Vince, On 4/9/21 3:10 AM, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: > On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 11:21 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> I think we should retain the deprecation until you actually follow through >> with any of the upstreaming. > In sum, we're investing in open source nanoMIPS tools because it

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

On 4/8/21 6:10 PM, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: I think we should retain the deprecation until you actually follow through with any of the upstreaming. You didn't even bother to commit your changes to a code repository -- merely uploaded tarballs. There have been no posts to the > gcc mailing lis

RE: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

On Thursday, April 8, 2021 2:17 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > NACK, for the reasons stated against v1: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-04/msg00663.html On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 11:21 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > I think we should retain the deprecation until you actually

Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

On 4/8/21 10:01 AM, Aleksandar Rikalo wrote: NanoMIPS ISA is supported again, since MediaTek is taking over nanoMIPS toolchain development (confirmed at https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/libvir/msg217107.html ). New release of the

[PATCH v2] Revert "target/mips: Deprecate nanoMIPS ISA"

NanoMIPS ISA is supported again, since MediaTek is taking over nanoMIPS toolchain development (confirmed at https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/libvir/msg217107.html). New release of the toolchain can be found at (https://github.com/MediaTek-Labs/nanomips-gnu-toolchain/releases/tag/nanoMIPS-2021.