On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 13:57:59 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:59:34 +0200
> Igor Mammedov escreveu:
>
> > On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:13:28 +0200
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > > The current logic is based on a lot of duct tape, with
> > > offsets calculated b
Em Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:59:34 +0200
Igor Mammedov escreveu:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:13:28 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > The current logic is based on a lot of duct tape, with
> > offsets calculated based on one define with the number of
> > source IDs and an enum.
> >
> > Rewrite
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:13:28 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The current logic is based on a lot of duct tape, with
> offsets calculated based on one define with the number of
> source IDs and an enum.
>
> Rewrite the logic in a way that it would be more resilient
> of code changes, by movi
The current logic is based on a lot of duct tape, with
offsets calculated based on one define with the number of
source IDs and an enum.
Rewrite the logic in a way that it would be more resilient
of code changes, by moving the source ID count to an enum
and make the offset calculus more explicit.
