On 3/27/20 2:49 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
> and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
> us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> ---
> include/hw/elf
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 09:50, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
> and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
> us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
> ---
> in
On 3/27/20 11:53 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:49 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
Signed
On 3/27/20 10:49 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
include/hw/elf_ops.h | 7
It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
include/hw/elf_ops.h | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+),
