On 02.10.24 11:04, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 10/1/24 10:54 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 30.09.24 23:49, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:29:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 27.09.24 20:20, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
On 10/1/24 10:54 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 30.09.24 23:49, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:29:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 27.09.24 20:20, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
That is a valid point. But IMHO the ben
On 30.09.24 23:49, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:29:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 27.09.24 20:20, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make
sense to create an org
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 20:29:19 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.09.24 20:20, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> >>> Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make
> >>> sense to create an org for it, so that i
On 27.09.24 20:20, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make
sense to create an org for it, so that it doesn't look like David's
personal project?
Frankly, I would prefer making Document
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 21:09:27 +0200
David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Anyway, if we want to proceed with the gitlab project, would it make
> > sense to create an org for it, so that it doesn't look like David's
> > personal project?
Frankly, I would prefer making Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/s390-diag.
On 11.09.24 17:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
I'd rather have it in a shared and bigger repo than in your personal
gitlab one. Maybe there's a space somewhere in QEMU or the Virtio team's
repos that would be a good fit if the kernel's docu isn't the
On Wed, Sep 11 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd rather have it in a shared and bigger repo than in your personal
>> > gitlab one. Maybe there's a space somewhere in QEMU or the Virtio team's
>> > repos that would be a good fit if the kernel's docu isn't the right place?
>>
>> At
> >
> > I'd rather have it in a shared and bigger repo than in your personal
> > gitlab one. Maybe there's a space somewhere in QEMU or the Virtio team's
> > repos that would be a good fit if the kernel's docu isn't the right place?
>
> At this point, outside of kernel/QEMU feels like the right t
On 11.09.24 13:49, Janosch Frank wrote:
On 9/10/24 7:57 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
This series introduces a new diag(500) "STORAGE LIMIT" subcode that will
be documented at [2] once this+kernel part go upstream.
Why not in Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/?
s390-diag.rst is very similar already.
On 9/10/24 7:57 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
This series introduces a new diag(500) "STORAGE LIMIT" subcode that will
be documented at [2] once this+kernel part go upstream.
Why not in Documentation/virt/kvm/s390/?
s390-diag.rst is very similar already.
I'd rather have it in a shared and bigge
On 10.09.24 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:57:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
This series is based on:
[PATCH v2] virtio: kconfig: memory devices are PCI only [1]
I finally found the time (IOW forced myself) to finish virtio-mem
support on s390x. The last
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:57:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This series is based on:
> [PATCH v2] virtio: kconfig: memory devices are PCI only [1]
>
> I finally found the time (IOW forced myself) to finish virtio-mem
> support on s390x. The last RFC was from 2020, so I won't talk abou
This series is based on:
[PATCH v2] virtio: kconfig: memory devices are PCI only [1]
I finally found the time (IOW forced myself) to finish virtio-mem
support on s390x. The last RFC was from 2020, so I won't talk about
what changed -- a lot changed in the meantime :)
There is really not much
14 matches
Mail list logo