David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 05.01.23 13:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Playing with background snapshots in combination with hugetlb and
>> virtio-mem, I found two issues and some reasonable optimizations (skip
>> unprotecting when unregistering).
>> With virtio-mem (RamDiscardManager), we now
On 05.01.23 13:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Playing with background snapshots in combination with hugetlb and
virtio-mem, I found two issues and some reasonable optimizations (skip
unprotecting when unregistering).
With virtio-mem (RamDiscardManager), we now won't be allocating unnecessary
page
On 05.01.23 22:11, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:45:23PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Playing with background snapshots in combination with hugetlb and
virtio-mem, I found two issues and some reasonable optimizations (skip
unprotecting when unregistering).
With virtio-mem (RamDi
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:45:23PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Playing with background snapshots in combination with hugetlb and
> virtio-mem, I found two issues and some reasonable optimizations (skip
> unprotecting when unregistering).
>
> With virtio-mem (RamDiscardManager), we now won't
Playing with background snapshots in combination with hugetlb and
virtio-mem, I found two issues and some reasonable optimizations (skip
unprotecting when unregistering).
With virtio-mem (RamDiscardManager), we now won't be allocating unnecessary
page tables for unplugged ranges when using uffd-wp