On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:42:12PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:11:47 -0500
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:52:06PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > This CXL component isn't allowed to have a RAS capability.
> > > Whilst this should be
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:11:47 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:52:06PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > This CXL component isn't allowed to have a RAS capability.
> > Whilst this should be harmless as software is not expected to look
> > here, good to clean it up.
>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:52:06PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> This CXL component isn't allowed to have a RAS capability.
> Whilst this should be harmless as software is not expected to look
> here, good to clean it up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron
Isn't this device migrateable? If y
This CXL component isn't allowed to have a RAS capability.
Whilst this should be harmless as software is not expected to look
here, good to clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron
---
I've been carrying this on my tree for quite a while.
This wasn't in previous fixes set because it's low p
