On 11/27/23 11:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
There is no architectural requirement that SME implies SVE, but
our implementation currently assumes it. (FEAT_SME_FA64 does
imply SVE.) So if you try to run a CPU with eg "-cpu max,sve=off"
you quickly run into an assert when the guest tries to write to
SM
On Mon, Nov 27 2023, Peter Maydell wrote:
> There is no architectural requirement that SME implies SVE, but
> our implementation currently assumes it. (FEAT_SME_FA64 does
> imply SVE.) So if you try to run a CPU with eg "-cpu max,sve=off"
> you quickly run into an assert when the guest tries to w
There is no architectural requirement that SME implies SVE, but
our implementation currently assumes it. (FEAT_SME_FA64 does
imply SVE.) So if you try to run a CPU with eg "-cpu max,sve=off"
you quickly run into an assert when the guest tries to write to
SMCR_EL1:
#6 0x74b38e96 in __GI___
