Re: [PATCH for-6.1 2/2] docs: Move licence/copyright from HTML output to rST comments

2021-07-23 Thread Markus Armbruster
Peter Maydell writes: > Our built HTML documentation now has a standard footer which > gives the license for QEMU (and its documentation as a whole). > In almost all pages, we either don't bother to state the > copyright/license for the individual rST sources, or we put > it in an rST comment. Th

Re: [PATCH for-6.1 2/2] docs: Move licence/copyright from HTML output to rST comments

2021-07-23 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:20:16PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > Our built HTML documentation now has a standard footer which > gives the license for QEMU (and its documentation as a whole). > In almost all pages, we either don't bother to state the > copyright/license for the individual rST source

Re: [PATCH for-6.1 2/2] docs: Move licence/copyright from HTML output to rST comments

2021-07-22 Thread Cleber Rosa
Peter Maydell writes: > Our built HTML documentation now has a standard footer which > gives the license for QEMU (and its documentation as a whole). > In almost all pages, we either don't bother to state the > copyright/license for the individual rST sources, or we put > it in an rST comment. T

[PATCH for-6.1 2/2] docs: Move licence/copyright from HTML output to rST comments

2021-07-22 Thread Peter Maydell
Our built HTML documentation now has a standard footer which gives the license for QEMU (and its documentation as a whole). In almost all pages, we either don't bother to state the copyright/license for the individual rST sources, or we put it in an rST comment. There are just three pages which ren