Peter Xu wrote:
> Add a new cap to allow mapping hugetlbfs backed RAMs in small page sizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela
> +bool migrate_hugetlb_doublemap(void)
> +{
> +MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
> +
> +return s->enabled_capabilities[MIGRATION_
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:45:38PM +, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Add a new cap to allow mapping hugetlbfs backed RAMs in small page sizes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Thanks.
>
> although, I'm c
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Add a new cap to allow mapping hugetlbfs backed RAMs in small page sizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
although, I'm curious if the protocol actually changes - or whether
a doublepage enabled destination would work wit
Add a new cap to allow mapping hugetlbfs backed RAMs in small page sizes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu
---
migration/migration.c | 48 ++-
migration/migration.h | 1 +
qapi/migration.json | 7 ++-
3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
