Peter Xu writes:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:17:40PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>>
>> > Peter Xu writes:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >>> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Peter Xu writes:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> On T
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:17:40PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>
> > Peter Xu writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >>> Fabiano Rosas writes:
> >>>
> >>> > Peter Xu writes:
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM
Fabiano Rosas writes:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>>>
>>> > Peter Xu writes:
>>> >
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> >>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas w
Peter Xu writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>>
>> > Peter Xu writes:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >>> > I don't think we're
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 04:14:20PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 16:09, Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > > > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:52:48PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Fabiano Rosas writes:
>
> > Peter Xu writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >>> > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at
Fabiano Rosas writes:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>>> > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
>>> > doesn't really add up. We're not looking into
Peter Xu writes:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
>> > doesn't really add up. We're not looking into making the CI finish
>> > faste
On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 16:09, Peter Xu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
> > > doesn't really add up. We're not looking in
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:13:16AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
> > doesn't really add up. We're not looking into making the CI finish
> > faster. We're looking into mak
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 14:48, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Maydell writes:
>> > For some examples from this week:
>> >
>> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7802183144
>> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7799842373
>> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-p
On Thu, 12 Sept 2024 at 14:48, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
> > For some examples from this week:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7802183144
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7799842373
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/7786579152
>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
>> doesn't really add up. We're not looking into making the CI finish
>> faster. We're looking into making migration-test finish faster. That
>>
On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 22:26, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> I don't think we're discussing total CI time at this point, so the math
> doesn't really add up. We're not looking into making the CI finish
> faster. We're looking into making migration-test finish faster. That
> would reduce timeouts in CI, s
Peter Xu writes:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:48:21PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Xu writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:23:43PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >> Peter Xu writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >> >> Peter Xu w
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 04:48:21PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:23:43PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> Peter Xu writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> >> Peter Xu writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On
Peter Xu writes:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:23:43PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Xu writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> >> Peter Xu writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 9 S
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 07:23:43PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> >> Peter Xu writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Hua
Peter Xu writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Peter Xu writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:54:46PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Peter Xu writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
> >> > the dirt
Peter Xu writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
>> >
>> > Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
>> > the dirty sync count may not always increase because this is
>> > an optimization tha
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:03 PM Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
> >
> > Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
> > the dirty sync count may not always increase because this is
> > an optimization that might not happen in any situatio
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
> >
> > Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
> > the dirty sync count may not always increase because this is
> > an optimization that might not happen in any
On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:51, Hyman Huang wrote:
>
> Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
> the dirty sync count may not always increase because this is
> an optimization that might not happen in any situation.
>
> This test case just making sure it doesn't interfere with
Despite the fact that the responsive CPU throttle is enabled,
the dirty sync count may not always increase because this is
an optimization that might not happen in any situation.
This test case just making sure it doesn't interfere with any
current functionality.
Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang
---
25 matches
Mail list logo