Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] hw/cxl: Type 2 Device RFC

2024-10-18 Thread Jonathan Cameron via
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:25:58 +0100 Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote: > On 10/18/24 15:49, Zhi Wang wrote: > > On 17/10/2024 19.57, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > >> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 5/18/23 04:45, Ira Weiny wrote: > >>> Type 2

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] hw/cxl: Type 2 Device RFC

2024-10-18 Thread Alejandro Lucero Palau
On 10/18/24 15:49, Zhi Wang wrote: On 17/10/2024 19.57, Cédric Le Goater wrote: External email: Use caution opening links or attachments Hello, On 5/18/23 04:45, Ira Weiny wrote: Type 2 devices are not yet a reality.  Developing core kernel support is difficult without some test device to

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] hw/cxl: Type 2 Device RFC

2024-10-18 Thread Zhi Wang
On 17/10/2024 19.57, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > Hello, > > On 5/18/23 04:45, Ira Weiny wrote: >> Type 2 devices are not yet a reality.  Developing core kernel support >> is difficult without some test device to model against. >> >> De

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] hw/cxl: Type 2 Device RFC

2024-10-17 Thread Cédric Le Goater
Hello, On 5/18/23 04:45, Ira Weiny wrote: Type 2 devices are not yet a reality. Developing core kernel support is difficult without some test device to model against. Define a type 2 device 'cxl-accel'. This device is derived from the type 3 device and retains all that functionality for now.

[PATCH RFC 0/5] hw/cxl: Type 2 Device RFC

2023-05-17 Thread Ira Weiny
Type 2 devices are not yet a reality. Developing core kernel support is difficult without some test device to model against. Define a type 2 device 'cxl-accel'. This device is derived from the type 3 device and retains all that functionality for now. Mock up a couple of accelerator features (Ba