On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 16:11:37 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
> > On 12/17/19 1:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> >> Un-snipping the QAPI schema change:
> >
> > Sorry about that...
> >
> >>
> diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> index
Eric Blake writes:
> On 12/17/19 1:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Un-snipping the QAPI schema change:
>
> Sorry about that...
>
>>
diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
index 0cf68fea14..bd651106bd 100644
--- a/qapi/block-core.json
+++ b/qapi/block-cor
On 12/17/19 1:36 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Un-snipping the QAPI schema change:
Sorry about that...
diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
index 0cf68fea14..bd651106bd 100644
--- a/qapi/block-core.json
+++ b/qapi/block-core.json
@@ -1752,6 +1752,8 @@
#
# Get the nam
Eric Blake writes:
> On 12/13/19 8:11 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> When a management application manages node names there's no reason to
>> recurse into backing images in the output of query-named-block-nodes.
>>
>> Add a parameter to the command which will return just the top level
>> structs.
>
>
On 12/13/19 8:11 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
When a management application manages node names there's no reason to
recurse into backing images in the output of query-named-block-nodes.
Add a parameter to the command which will return just the top level
structs.
At one point, Kevin was working on a
When a management application manages node names there's no reason to
recurse into backing images in the output of query-named-block-nodes.
Add a parameter to the command which will return just the top level
structs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
block.c | 5 +++--
block/qapi.c