> On May 12, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:30:50PM -0400, Jag Raman wrote:
>>> On May 11, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Have you decided whether to drop the remote device program in favor of
>>> using a softmmu make targe
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:30:50PM -0400, Jag Raman wrote:
> > On May 11, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Have you decided whether to drop the remote device program in favor of
> > using a softmmu make target?
> >
> > Is there anything in this series you'd like me to re
> On May 11, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Have you decided whether to drop the remote device program in favor of
> using a softmmu make target?
>
> Is there anything in this series you'd like me to review before you send
> the next revision?
Hi Stefan,
We are planning
Hi,
Have you decided whether to drop the remote device program in favor of
using a softmmu make target?
Is there anything in this series you'd like me to review before you send
the next revision?
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:30:30AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > I suggest dropping the remote device program from this patch series (and
> > > maybe never bringing it back). Instead, use the softmmu target for the
> > > remote device.
...
> >
> > Building QEMU twices just to get the remo
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:47:24PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
> > > We will post separate patchsets for the following improvements for
> > > the e
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:29:20PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
> > We will post separate patchsets for the following improvements for
> > the experimental Qemu multi-process:
> > - Live migration;
> > - Asynchronous c
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
> We will post separate patchsets for the following improvements for
> the experimental Qemu multi-process:
> - Live migration;
> - Asynchronous communication channel;
> - Libvirt support;
>
> We welcome all your ideas,
On 24.04.20 14:53, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 4/24/20 7:48 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com
>> wrote:
>>> There is an error in travis-ci build test which does not get reproduced.
>>>
>>> TEST iotest-qcow2: 041 [fail]
>>> QEMU
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
> > There is an error in travis-ci build test which does not get reproduced.
> >
> > TESTiotest-qcow2: 041 [fail]
> > QEMU --
> > "/home/tra
On 4/24/20 7:48 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
There is an error in travis-ci build test which does not get reproduced.
TESTiotest-qcow2: 041 [fail]
QEMU --
"/home/travis/build/elena-ufimtseva/qemu-multiproc
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:13:35PM -0700, elena.ufimts...@oracle.com wrote:
> There is an error in travis-ci build test which does not get reproduced.
>
> TESTiotest-qcow2: 041 [fail]
> QEMU --
> "/home/travis/build/elena-ufimtseva/qemu-multiprocess/out-of-tree/build/dir/tests/qemu-
From: Elena Ufimtseva
Hello
This is a resend of v6 patchset since we regrettably omitted few comments
from v5 review in the previously sent series
(see in https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-04/msg00828.html).
We also run more tests and fixed the build errors that were found in v
13 matches
Mail list logo
