On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:34:24AM +0800, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:34:24 +0800
> From: "wangyanan (Y)"
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 07/18] i386: Support modules_per_die in
> X86CPUTopoInfo
>
> Hi Zhao,
>
> 在 2023/2/13 17:36, Zha
Hi Zhao,
在 2023/2/13 17:36, Zhao Liu 写道:
From: Zhuocheng Ding
Support module level in i386 cpu topology structure "X86CPUTopoInfo".
Before updating APIC ID parsing rule with module level, the
apicid_core_width() temporarily combines the core and module levels
together.
If we dont merge this
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 06:38:31PM +0800, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:38:31 +0800
> From: "wangyanan (Y)"
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 07/18] i386: Support modules_per_die in
> X86CPUTopoInfo
>
> 在 2023/2/13 17:36, Zhao Liu 写道:
> > From
在 2023/2/13 17:36, Zhao Liu 写道:
From: Zhuocheng Ding
Support module level in i386 cpu topology structure "X86CPUTopoInfo".
Before updating APIC ID parsing rule with module level, the
apicid_core_width() temporarily combines the core and module levels
together.
At present, we don't expose modu
From: Zhuocheng Ding
Support module level in i386 cpu topology structure "X86CPUTopoInfo".
Before updating APIC ID parsing rule with module level, the
apicid_core_width() temporarily combines the core and module levels
together.
At present, we don't expose module level in CPUID.1FH because curr
