On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 7:34 PM AEST, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 5:49 PM AEST, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > On 23.06.2023 15:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > pseries can run reverse-debugging well enough to pass basic tests.
> > >
> > > There is strangeness with reverse-continue
On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 5:49 PM AEST, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> On 23.06.2023 15:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > pseries can run reverse-debugging well enough to pass basic tests.
> >
> > There is strangeness with reverse-continue possibly relating to a bp
> > being set on the first instruction or on
On 23.06.2023 15:57, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
pseries can run reverse-debugging well enough to pass basic tests.
There is strangeness with reverse-continue possibly relating to a bp
being set on the first instruction or on a snapshot, that causes
the PC to be reported on the first instruction rath
pseries can run reverse-debugging well enough to pass basic tests.
There is strangeness with reverse-continue possibly relating to a bp
being set on the first instruction or on a snapshot, that causes
the PC to be reported on the first instruction rather than last
breakpoint, so a workaround is ad
