On 24.07.23 20:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 20.07.23 18:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 19.07.23 16:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> On 20.07.23 18:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > > On 19.07.23 16:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > > > On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 11,
On 20.07.23 18:03, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 19.07.23 16:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
The only user of vhost_user_reset_status
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> On 19.07.23 16:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > > > The only user of vhost_user_reset_status() is vhost_dev_stop(), whic
On 19.07.23 16:11, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
The only user of vhost_user_reset_status() is vhost_dev_stop(), which
only uses it as a fall-back to stop the back-end if it does not support
SUSPEN
On 18.07.23 17:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
The only user of vhost_user_reset_status() is vhost_dev_stop(), which
only uses it as a fall-back to stop the back-end if it does not support
SUSPEND. However, vhost-user's implementation i
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:52:28PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> The only user of vhost_user_reset_status() is vhost_dev_stop(), which
> only uses it as a fall-back to stop the back-end if it does not support
> SUSPEND. However, vhost-user's implementation is a no-op unless the
> back-end support
The only user of vhost_user_reset_status() is vhost_dev_stop(), which
only uses it as a fall-back to stop the back-end if it does not support
SUSPEND. However, vhost-user's implementation is a no-op unless the
back-end supports SET_STATUS.
vhost-vdpa's implementation instead just calls
vhost_vdpa