On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:21:18 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Previous 9p patch fixed 'Twalk' request handling, which was previously not
> behaving as specified by the 9p2000 protocol spec. This patch adds a new test
> case which guards the new 'Twalk' behaviour in question.
>
> More specific
On Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 19:21:18 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Previous 9p patch fixed 'Twalk' request handling, which was previously not
> behaving as specified by the 9p2000 protocol spec. This patch adds a new
> test case which guards the new 'Twalk' behaviour in question.
>
> More speci
Previous 9p patch fixed 'Twalk' request handling, which was previously not
behaving as specified by the 9p2000 protocol spec. This patch adds a new test
case which guards the new 'Twalk' behaviour in question.
More specifically: it sends a 'Twalk' request where the 1st path component
is valid, whe
