Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles
On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 13:10 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Have xive_tctx_notify() also set the new PIPR value and rename it to
> xive_tctx_pipr_set(). This can replace the last xive_tctx_pipr_update()
> caller because it does not need to update IPB (it already sets it).
On 5/11/2025 10:10 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
Have xive_tctx_notify() also set the new PIPR value and rename it to
xive_tctx_pipr_set(). This can replace the last xive_tctx_pipr_update()
caller because it does not need to update IPB (it already sets it).
Reviewed-by: Michael Kowal
Thanks, M
Have xive_tctx_notify() also set the new PIPR value and rename it to
xive_tctx_pipr_set(). This can replace the last xive_tctx_pipr_update()
caller because it does not need to update IPB (it already sets it).
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
hw/intc/xive.c| 39 +++--
