On 3/5/20 12:59 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
And went this less intrusive way.
I'll respin with s/-1/UINT8_MAX/.
Problem, now this entry is ignored (interface_class==-1):
Yep, "-1" is used as "not used" or "end-of-list" indicator, and it is
outside the valid range to avoid that kind of clashes.
> > And went this less intrusive way.
> >
> > I'll respin with s/-1/UINT8_MAX/.
>
> Problem, now this entry is ignored (interface_class==-1):
Yep, "-1" is used as "not used" or "end-of-list" indicator, and it is
outside the valid range to avoid that kind of clashes. You need some
other way to ex
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
> On 3/5/20 9:02 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> struct usb_device_id {
> >> -int vendor_id;
> >> -int product_id;
> >> -int interface_class;
> >> -int interface_subclass;
> >> -int interface_protocol;
> >> +int1
On 3/5/20 9:02 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
struct usb_device_id {
-int vendor_id;
-int product_id;
-int interface_class;
-int interface_subclass;
-int interface_protocol;
+int16_t vendor_id;
+int16_t product_id;
+int8_t interface_class;
+int8_t interface_subclas
> struct usb_device_id {
> -int vendor_id;
> -int product_id;
> -int interface_class;
> -int interface_subclass;
> -int interface_protocol;
> +int16_t vendor_id;
> +int16_t product_id;
> +int8_t interface_class;
> +int8_t interface_subclass;
> +int8_t interf
The USB descriptor sizes are specified as 16-bit for idVendor /
idProduct, and 8-bit for bInterfaceClass / bInterfaceSubClass /
bInterfaceProtocol. Doing so we reduce the usbredir_raw_serial_ids[]
and usbredir_ftdi_serial_ids[] arrays from 16KiB to 6KiB (size
reported on x86_64 host, building with
