Re: [PATCH 3/4] xics: Rename misleading ics_simple_*() functions

2019-09-24 Thread Greg Kurz
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:59:51 +1000 David Gibson wrote: > There are a number of ics_simple_*() functions that aren't actually > specific to TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE at all, and are equally valid on > TYPE_XICS_BASE. Rename them to ics_*() accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson > --- Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH 3/4] xics: Rename misleading ics_simple_*() functions

2019-09-23 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 24/09/2019 06:59, David Gibson wrote: > There are a number of ics_simple_*() functions that aren't actually > specific to TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE at all, and are equally valid on > TYPE_XICS_BASE. Rename them to ics_*() accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater C

[PATCH 3/4] xics: Rename misleading ics_simple_*() functions

2019-09-23 Thread David Gibson
There are a number of ics_simple_*() functions that aren't actually specific to TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE at all, and are equally valid on TYPE_XICS_BASE. Rename them to ics_*() accordingly. Signed-off-by: David Gibson --- hw/intc/trace-events | 6 +++--- hw/intc/xics.c| 29 ++-