On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:54:37PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:05:38 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > In the spapr code we've been gradually moving towards a convention that
> > functions which create pieces of the device tree are called spapr_dt_*().
> > This patch speeds t
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:05:38 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> In the spapr code we've been gradually moving towards a convention that
> functions which create pieces of the device tree are called spapr_dt_*().
> This patch speeds that along by renaming most of the things that don't yet
> match that so
On 3/13/20 5:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> In the spapr code we've been gradually moving towards a convention that
> functions which create pieces of the device tree are called spapr_dt_*().
> This patch speeds that along by renaming most of the things that don't yet
> match that so that they do.
>
In the spapr code we've been gradually moving towards a convention that
functions which create pieces of the device tree are called spapr_dt_*().
This patch speeds that along by renaming most of the things that don't yet
match that so that they do.
For now we leave the *_dt_populate() functions wh
