On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 11:53 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/24 10:02, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:32:21PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/9/24 14:07, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford
> > > > ---
On 1/11/24 10:02, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:32:21PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 1/9/24 14:07, Rob Bradford wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford
---
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:32:21PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/24 14:07, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford
> > ---
> > target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu
Rob,
Given that you'll need to resend the patches due to the conflict in patch 2,
I think it would be nice to mention in this commit message that we're ok with
enabling RVB in the 'max' CPU, even though RVB per se is experimental, because
it's just an alias for extensions that the CPU already use
On 1/9/24 14:07, Rob Bradford wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford
---
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index f10871d352..9705daec93 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford
---
target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index f10871d352..9705daec93 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -999,7
