Hi Alex,
January 9, 2025 at 6:06 PM, "Alex Bennée" wrote:
> While it would be technically correct to allow an IRQ to happen (as
> the offending instruction never really completed) it messes up
> instrumentation. We already take care to only use memory
> instrumentation on the block, we should also
On 1/9/25 09:06, Alex Bennée wrote:
While it would be technically correct to allow an IRQ to happen (as
the offending instruction never really completed) it messes up
instrumentation. We already take care to only use memory
instrumentation on the block, we should also suppress IRQs.
Signed-off-b
On 1/9/25 09:06, Alex Bennée wrote:
While it would be technically correct to allow an IRQ to happen (as
the offending instruction never really completed) it messes up
instrumentation. We already take care to only use memory
instrumentation on the block, we should also suppress IRQs.
Signed-off-b
While it would be technically correct to allow an IRQ to happen (as
the offending instruction never really completed) it messes up
instrumentation. We already take care to only use memory
instrumentation on the block, we should also suppress IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
Cc: Richard Henderson
