Le 25/11/2019 à 14:38, Markus Armbruster a écrit :
> test_keyval_visit_size() should test for trailing crap after size with
> and without suffix. It does test the latter: "sz2=16Gi" has size
> "16G" followed by crap "i". It fails to test the former "sz1=16E" is
> a syntactically valid size that o
On 11/25/19 9:31 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eric Blake writes:
On 11/25/19 7:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
test_keyval_visit_size() should test for trailing crap after size with
and without suffix. It does test the latter: "sz2=16Gi" has size
"16G" followed by crap "i". It fails to test
Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/25/19 7:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> test_keyval_visit_size() should test for trailing crap after size with
>> and without suffix. It does test the latter: "sz2=16Gi" has size
>> "16G" followed by crap "i". It fails to test the former "sz1=16E" is
>> a syntactic
On 11/25/19 7:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
test_keyval_visit_size() should test for trailing crap after size with
and without suffix. It does test the latter: "sz2=16Gi" has size
"16G" followed by crap "i". It fails to test the former "sz1=16E" is
a syntactically valid size that overflows ui
test_keyval_visit_size() should test for trailing crap after size with
and without suffix. It does test the latter: "sz2=16Gi" has size
"16G" followed by crap "i". It fails to test the former "sz1=16E" is
a syntactically valid size that overflows uint64_t. Replace by
"sz1=0Z".
Signed-off-by: Ma
