Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Check 'A' and split extensions for atomic instructions

On Thu, 2024-01-18 at 16:49 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > On 1/15/24 13:25, Rob Bradford wrote: > > Following the pattern for 'M' and Zmmul check if either the 'A' > > extension is enabled or the appropriate split extension for the > > instruction. > > > > Also remove the assumptio

Re: [PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Check 'A' and split extensions for atomic instructions

On 1/15/24 13:25, Rob Bradford wrote: Following the pattern for 'M' and Zmmul check if either the 'A' extension is enabled or the appropriate split extension for the instruction. Also remove the assumption that only checking for 64-bit systems is required for the double word variants. Code

[PATCH 2/2] target/riscv: Check 'A' and split extensions for atomic instructions

Following the pattern for 'M' and Zmmul check if either the 'A' extension is enabled or the appropriate split extension for the instruction. Also remove the assumption that only checking for 64-bit systems is required for the double word variants. Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford --- target/riscv/in