Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory: suppress INVALID_MEM logs caused by debug access

2025-03-17 Thread Nicholas Piggin
On Mon Mar 17, 2025 at 7:03 PM AEST, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 14/3/25 08:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> Debugger-driven invalid memory accesses are not guest errors, so should >> not cause these error logs. >> >> Debuggers can access memory wildly, including access to addresses not >> spe

Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory: suppress INVALID_MEM logs caused by debug access

2025-03-17 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 14/3/25 08:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Debugger-driven invalid memory accesses are not guest errors, so should not cause these error logs. Debuggers can access memory wildly, including access to addresses not specified by the user (e.g., gdb it might try to walk the stack or load target addres

Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory: suppress INVALID_MEM logs caused by debug access

2025-03-14 Thread Richard Henderson
On 3/14/25 08:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: On 14/3/25 08:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Debugger-driven invalid memory accesses are not guest errors, so should not cause these error logs. Debuggers can access memory wildly, including access to addresses not specified by the user (e.g., gdb it

Re: [PATCH 2/2] memory: suppress INVALID_MEM logs caused by debug access

2025-03-14 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 14/3/25 08:41, Nicholas Piggin wrote: Debugger-driven invalid memory accesses are not guest errors, so should not cause these error logs. Debuggers can access memory wildly, including access to addresses not specified by the user (e.g., gdb it might try to walk the stack or load target addres

[PATCH 2/2] memory: suppress INVALID_MEM logs caused by debug access

2025-03-14 Thread Nicholas Piggin
Debugger-driven invalid memory accesses are not guest errors, so should not cause these error logs. Debuggers can access memory wildly, including access to addresses not specified by the user (e.g., gdb it might try to walk the stack or load target addresses to display disassembly). Failure is rep