On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:10 AM Bin Meng wrote:
>
> The pending register upper limit is currently set to
> plic->num_sources >> 3, which is wrong, e.g.: considering
> plic->num_sources is 7, the upper limit becomes 0 which fails
> the range check if reading the pending register at pending_base.
>
On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 16:21 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 8:28 AM Wilfred Mallawa
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 22:08 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > The pending register upper limit is currently set to
> > > plic->num_sources >> 3, which is wrong, e.g.: considering
> > >
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 8:28 AM Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 22:08 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > The pending register upper limit is currently set to
> > plic->num_sources >> 3, which is wrong, e.g.: considering
> > plic->num_sources is 7, the upper limit becomes 0 which fails
> >
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 22:08 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> The pending register upper limit is currently set to
> plic->num_sources >> 3, which is wrong, e.g.: considering
> plic->num_sources is 7, the upper limit becomes 0 which fails
> the range check if reading the pending register at pending_base.
>
The pending register upper limit is currently set to
plic->num_sources >> 3, which is wrong, e.g.: considering
plic->num_sources is 7, the upper limit becomes 0 which fails
the range check if reading the pending register at pending_base.
Fixes: 1e24429e40df ("SiFive RISC-V PLIC Block")
Signed-off-
