Re: [PATCH 12/26] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Correct comment about CTE RDBase field size

2021-12-13 Thread Alex Bennée
Peter Maydell writes: > The comment says that in our CTE format the RDBase field is 36 bits; > in fact for us it is only 16 bits, because we use the RDBase format > where it specifies a 16-bit CPU number. The code already uses > RDBASE_PROCNUM_LENGTH (16) as the field width, so fix the comment

Re: [PATCH 12/26] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Correct comment about CTE RDBase field size

2021-12-12 Thread Richard Henderson
On 12/11/21 11:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: The comment says that in our CTE format the RDBase field is 36 bits; in fact for us it is only 16 bits, because we use the RDBase format where it specifies a 16-bit CPU number. The code already uses RDBASE_PROCNUM_LENGTH (16) as the field width, so fix t

[PATCH 12/26] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its: Correct comment about CTE RDBase field size

2021-12-11 Thread Peter Maydell
The comment says that in our CTE format the RDBase field is 36 bits; in fact for us it is only 16 bits, because we use the RDBase format where it specifies a 16-bit CPU number. The code already uses RDBASE_PROCNUM_LENGTH (16) as the field width, so fix the comment to match it. Signed-off-by: Peter