Peter Maydell writes:
> Currently the ITS code that reads and writes DTEs uses open-coded
> shift-and-mask to assemble the various fields into the 64-bit DTE
> word. The names of the macros used for mask and shift values are
> also somewhat inconsistent, and don't follow our usual convention
>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 10:16 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 12/11/21 20:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Currently the ITS code that reads and writes DTEs uses open-coded
> > shift-and-mask to assemble the various fields into the 64-bit DTE
> > word. The names of the macros used for mask and
On 12/11/21 20:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Currently the ITS code that reads and writes DTEs uses open-coded
> shift-and-mask to assemble the various fields into the 64-bit DTE
> word. The names of the macros used for mask and shift values are
> also somewhat inconsistent, and don't follow our usua
On 12/11/21 11:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Currently the ITS code that reads and writes DTEs uses open-coded
shift-and-mask to assemble the various fields into the 64-bit DTE
word. The names of the macros used for mask and shift values are
also somewhat inconsistent, and don't follow our usual c
Currently the ITS code that reads and writes DTEs uses open-coded
shift-and-mask to assemble the various fields into the 64-bit DTE
word. The names of the macros used for mask and shift values are
also somewhat inconsistent, and don't follow our usual convention
that a MASK macro should specify th
