On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 8/19/22 18:55, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
To allow removing the do_init hack we need to improve the DDR2 SDRAM
controller model to handle the enable/disable bit that it ignored so
far.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 34 +++
On 8/19/22 18:55, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
To allow removing the do_init hack we need to improve the DDR2 SDRAM
controller model to handle the enable/disable bit that it ignored so
far.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 34 --
1 file changed,
On Sun, 4 Sep 2022, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via wrote:
On 19/8/22 18:55, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
To allow removing the do_init hack we need to improve the DDR2 SDRAM
controller model to handle the enable/disable bit that it ignored so
far.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c |
On 19/8/22 18:55, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
To allow removing the do_init hack we need to improve the DDR2 SDRAM
controller model to handle the enable/disable bit that it ignored so
far.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 34 --
1 file changed,
To allow removing the do_init hack we need to improve the DDR2 SDRAM
controller model to handle the enable/disable bit that it ignored so
far.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan
---
hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 34 --
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --gi