Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/s390x: Fix s390_probe_access for user-only

2023-03-16 Thread Richard Henderson
On 3/15/23 08:30, Thomas Huth wrote: On 09/01/2023 21.18, Richard Henderson wrote: In db9aab5783a2 we broke the contract of s390_probe_access, in that it no longer returned an exception code, nor set __excp_addr.  Fix both. Reported-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson ---  

Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/s390x: Fix s390_probe_access for user-only

2023-03-15 Thread Thomas Huth
On 09/01/2023 21.18, Richard Henderson wrote: In db9aab5783a2 we broke the contract of s390_probe_access, in that it no longer returned an exception code, nor set __excp_addr. Fix both. Reported-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 31 ++

Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/s390x: Fix s390_probe_access for user-only

2023-01-11 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 09.01.23 21:18, Richard Henderson wrote: In db9aab5783a2 we broke the contract of s390_probe_access, in that it no longer returned an exception code, nor set __excp_addr. Fix both. Reported-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Should we add a Fixes tag? Reviewed-by: Da

[PATCH 1/7] target/s390x: Fix s390_probe_access for user-only

2023-01-09 Thread Richard Henderson
In db9aab5783a2 we broke the contract of s390_probe_access, in that it no longer returned an exception code, nor set __excp_addr. Fix both. Reported-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 31 ++- 1 file changed, 18