On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:59:49 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> Currently ics_reject(), ics_resend() and ics_eoi() indirect through
> class methods. But there's only one implementation of each method,
> the one in TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE. TYPE_ICS_BASE has no implementation, but
> it's never instantiated, and
On 24/09/2019 06:59, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently ics_reject(), ics_resend() and ics_eoi() indirect through
> class methods. But there's only one implementation of each method,
> the one in TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE. TYPE_ICS_BASE has no implementation, but
> it's never instantiated, and has no other su
Currently ics_reject(), ics_resend() and ics_eoi() indirect through
class methods. But there's only one implementation of each method,
the one in TYPE_ICS_SIMPLE. TYPE_ICS_BASE has no implementation, but
it's never instantiated, and has no other subtypes.
So clean up by eliminating the method an
