On 17.12.19 15:59, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() assumes that all nodes in a given subtree
> are either active or inactive when it starts. Therefore, as soon as it
> arrives at an already active node, it stops.
>
> However, this assumption is wrong. For example, it's possible to
Am 17.12.2019 um 15:59 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() assumes that all nodes in a given subtree
> are either active or inactive when it starts. Therefore, as soon as it
> arrives at an already active node, it stops.
>
> However, this assumption is wrong. For example, it'
bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() assumes that all nodes in a given subtree
are either active or inactive when it starts. Therefore, as soon as it
arrives at an already active node, it stops.
However, this assumption is wrong. For example, it's possible to take a
snapshot of an inactive node, which resu
