在 2022/11/7 23:29, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 写道:
On 7/11/22 23:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/11/22 17:57, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Some implementations (i.e. Loongson-2F) may decide to implement a 64
bit
FPU without implmenting COP1X instructions.
As the eligibility of 64 bit FP instructio
On 7/11/22 23:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/11/22 17:57, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Some implementations (i.e. Loongson-2F) may decide to implement a 64 bit
FPU without implmenting COP1X instructions.
As the eligibility of 64 bit FP instructions is already determined by
CP0St_FR, there is no n
On 2/11/22 17:57, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Some implementations (i.e. Loongson-2F) may decide to implement a 64 bit
FPU without implmenting COP1X instructions.
As the eligibility of 64 bit FP instructions is already determined by
CP0St_FR, there is no need to check for COP1X again.
Signed-off-by: Jia
On 2/11/22 17:57, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
Some implementations (i.e. Loongson-2F) may decide to implement a 64 bit
FPU without implmenting COP1X instructions.
As the eligibility of 64 bit FP instructions is already determined by
CP0St_FR, there is no need to check for COP1X again.
Signed-off-by: Jia
Some implementations (i.e. Loongson-2F) may decide to implement a 64 bit
FPU without implmenting COP1X instructions.
As the eligibility of 64 bit FP instructions is already determined by
CP0St_FR, there is no need to check for COP1X again.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang
---
target/mips/tcg/translat
