On 5/2/22 19:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 18:05, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Assuming that mc146818_rtc_init() is "syntactic sugar" for code that could
be converted into configuration in the future, this patch is a step towards
this future by freeing piix4 to care about the inner
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 18:05, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>
> Assuming that mc146818_rtc_init() is "syntactic sugar" for code that could
> be converted into configuration in the future, this patch is a step towards
> this future by freeing piix4 to care about the inner details of mc146818.
>
> Furtherm
Assuming that mc146818_rtc_init() is "syntactic sugar" for code that could
be converted into configuration in the future, this patch is a step towards
this future by freeing piix4 to care about the inner details of mc146818.
Furthermore, by reusing mc146818_rtc_init(), piix4's code becomes more
ho
