> Am 12.01.2022 um 22:06 schrieb Ilya Dryomov :
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:39 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.01.22 um 10:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a
sn
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:39 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 12.01.22 um 10:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a
> >> snapshot was wrong.
> >>
> >> We can see a hole in an image if
Am 12.01.22 um 10:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>> the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a snapshot
>> was wrong.
>>
>> We can see a hole in an image if we diff against base if there exists an
>> older snapshot
>> of t
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:42 PM Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a snapshot
> was wrong.
>
> We can see a hole in an image if we diff against base if there exists an
> older snapshot
> of the image and we have discarded blocks in the imag
the assumption that we can't hit a hole if we do not diff against a snapshot
was wrong.
We can see a hole in an image if we diff against base if there exists an older
snapshot
of the image and we have discarded blocks in the image where the snapshot has
data.
Fixes: 0347a8fd4c3faaedf119be04c19
