On 4/17/2023 9:01 PM, Wu, Fei wrote:
> On 4/17/2023 8:11 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>>
>>> On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
"Wu, Fei" writes:
> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>
>>> On 4/6/23
On 4/17/2023 8:11 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>
>> On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>>>
On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> If your aim is
"Wu, Fei" writes:
> On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>>
>>> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the curr
On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>
>> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>>
On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
> "info jit" that you can
On 4/12/2023 9:28 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>
>> On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>>>
On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> If your aim is
"Wu, Fei" writes:
> On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>>
>>> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the curr
On 4/11/2023 3:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> "Wu, Fei" writes:
>
>> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>>
On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
> "info jit" that you can
"Wu, Fei" writes:
> On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>
>>> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
"info jit" that you can access via the HMP? Also I'm wondering if its
On 4/10/2023 6:36 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
>>> "info jit" that you can access via the HMP? Also I'm wondering if its
>>> time to remove the #ifdefs fro
"Wu, Fei" writes:
> On 4/6/2023 3:46 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Fei Wu writes:
>>
>>> The translation ratio of host to guest instruction count is one of the
>>> key performance factor of binary translation. TCG doesn't collect host
>>> instruction count at present, it does collect host ins
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
>> "info jit" that you can access via the HMP? Also I'm wondering if its
>> time to remove the #ifdefs from CONFIG_PROFILER because I doubt the
>> extra dat
On 4/6/23 00:46, Alex Bennée wrote:
If your aim is to examine JIT efficiency what is wrong with the current
"info jit" that you can access via the HMP? Also I'm wondering if its
time to remove the #ifdefs from CONFIG_PROFILER because I doubt the
extra data it collects is that expensive.
Richard,
On 4/6/2023 3:46 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Fei Wu writes:
>
>> The translation ratio of host to guest instruction count is one of the
>> key performance factor of binary translation. TCG doesn't collect host
>> instruction count at present, it does collect host instruction size
>> instead, alth
Fei Wu writes:
> The translation ratio of host to guest instruction count is one of the
> key performance factor of binary translation. TCG doesn't collect host
> instruction count at present, it does collect host instruction size
> instead, although they are not the same thing as instruction s
The translation ratio of host to guest instruction count is one of the
key performance factor of binary translation. TCG doesn't collect host
instruction count at present, it does collect host instruction size
instead, although they are not the same thing as instruction size might
not be fixed, ins
15 matches
Mail list logo