On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:59 AM Hanna Reitz wrote:
> On 17.09.21 07:40, John Snow wrote:
> > If we spy on the QMP commands instead, we don't need callers to remember
> > to pass it. Seems like a fair trade-off.
> >
> > The one slightly weird bit is overloading this instance variable for
> > wait(
On 17.09.21 07:40, John Snow wrote:
If we spy on the QMP commands instead, we don't need callers to remember
to pass it. Seems like a fair trade-off.
The one slightly weird bit is overloading this instance variable for
wait(), where we use it to mean "don't issue the qmp 'quit'
command". This me
If we spy on the QMP commands instead, we don't need callers to remember
to pass it. Seems like a fair trade-off.
The one slightly weird bit is overloading this instance variable for
wait(), where we use it to mean "don't issue the qmp 'quit'
command". This means that wait() will "fail" if the QEM
