On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 15:00 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 29.09.19 18:33, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > > Tests should not overwrite all user-supplied image options, but only add
> > > to it (which will effectively overwrite conflicting values). A
On 29.09.19 18:33, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Tests should not overwrite all user-supplied image options, but only add
>> to it (which will effectively overwrite conflicting values). Accomplish
>> this by passing options to _make_test_img via -o
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:42 +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> Tests should not overwrite all user-supplied image options, but only add
> to it (which will effectively overwrite conflicting values). Accomplish
> this by passing options to _make_test_img via -o instead of $IMGOPTS.
>
> For some tests, ther
Tests should not overwrite all user-supplied image options, but only add
to it (which will effectively overwrite conflicting values). Accomplish
this by passing options to _make_test_img via -o instead of $IMGOPTS.
For some tests, there is no functional change because they already only
appended o
