On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:31:04 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Writes to interrupt_request used non-atomic accesses, but there are a
> few cases where the access was not protected by the BQL. Now that
> there is a full set of helpers, it's easier to guarantee that
> interrupt_request accesses are ful
On 29/8/25 17:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Writes to interrupt_request used non-atomic accesses, but there are a
few cases where the access was not protected by the BQL. Now that
there is a full set of helpers, it's easier to guarantee that
interrupt_request accesses are fully atomic, so just drop t
On 8/30/25 01:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Writes to interrupt_request used non-atomic accesses, but there are a
few cases where the access was not protected by the BQL. Now that
there is a full set of helpers, it's easier to guarantee that
interrupt_request accesses are fully atomic, so just drop t
Writes to interrupt_request used non-atomic accesses, but there are a
few cases where the access was not protected by the BQL. Now that
there is a full set of helpers, it's easier to guarantee that
interrupt_request accesses are fully atomic, so just drop the
requirement instead of fixing them.
S
