Re: [PATCH 05/52] migration/rdma: Consistently use uint64_t for work request IDs

2023-09-18 Thread Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
On 18/09/2023 22:41, Markus Armbruster wrote: > We use int instead of uint64_t in a few places. Change them to > uint64_t. > > This cleans up a comparison of signed qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() > parameter @wrid_requested with unsigned @wr_id. Harmless, because the > actual arguments are non-neg

Re: [PATCH 05/52] migration/rdma: Consistently use uint64_t for work request IDs

2023-09-18 Thread Fabiano Rosas
Markus Armbruster writes: > We use int instead of uint64_t in a few places. Change them to > uint64_t. > > This cleans up a comparison of signed qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() > parameter @wrid_requested with unsigned @wr_id. Harmless, because the > actual arguments are non-negative enumeration con

[PATCH 05/52] migration/rdma: Consistently use uint64_t for work request IDs

2023-09-18 Thread Markus Armbruster
We use int instead of uint64_t in a few places. Change them to uint64_t. This cleans up a comparison of signed qemu_rdma_block_for_wrid() parameter @wrid_requested with unsigned @wr_id. Harmless, because the actual arguments are non-negative enumeration constants. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbrust