On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:59:52AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:45:18 +1000
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > Currently TYPE_XICS_BASE and TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE have their own reset methods,
> > using the standard technique for having the subtype call the supertype's
> > methods before d
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:45:18 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> Currently TYPE_XICS_BASE and TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE have their own reset methods,
> using the standard technique for having the subtype call the supertype's
> methods before doing its own thing.
>
> But TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE is the only subtype of TY
On 25/09/2019 08:45, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently TYPE_XICS_BASE and TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE have their own reset methods,
> using the standard technique for having the subtype call the supertype's
> methods before doing its own thing.
>
> But TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE is the only subtype of TYPE_XICS_BASE eve
Currently TYPE_XICS_BASE and TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE have their own reset methods,
using the standard technique for having the subtype call the supertype's
methods before doing its own thing.
But TYPE_XICS_SIMPLE is the only subtype of TYPE_XICS_BASE ever
instantiated, so there's no point having the spli