On 3/23/21 5:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
A few old comments talk about "desired future use of defaults" and
"anonymous inline branch types". Kind of misleading since commit
87adbbffd4 "qapi: add a dictionary form for TYPE" added longhand
member definitions. Talk about that instead.
Signed-
On 3/23/21 9:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 3/23/21 8:00 AM, John Snow wrote:
On 3/23/21 5:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
+# event 'data' member with dict value is (longhand) argument
+# definition, not inline complex type
I have to be a weenie and say I don't know exactly what this comment is
On 3/23/21 4:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> A few old comments talk about "desired future use of defaults" and
> "anonymous inline branch types". Kind of misleading since commit
> 87adbbffd4 "qapi: add a dictionary form for TYPE" added longhand
> member definitions. Talk about that instead.
>
On 3/23/21 8:00 AM, John Snow wrote:
> On 3/23/21 5:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> +# event 'data' member with dict value is (longhand) argument
>> +# definition, not inline complex type
>
> I have to be a weenie and say I don't know exactly what this comment is
> telling me.
>
> (1) What's a
On 3/23/21 5:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
+# event 'data' member with dict value is (longhand) argument
+# definition, not inline complex type
I have to be a weenie and say I don't know exactly what this comment is
telling me.
(1) What's a longhand argument?
(2) What's an inline complex t
A few old comments talk about "desired future use of defaults" and
"anonymous inline branch types". Kind of misleading since commit
87adbbffd4 "qapi: add a dictionary form for TYPE" added longhand
member definitions. Talk about that instead.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster
---
tests/qapi-sche
