On Fri 31 Jan 2020 06:44:22 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote:
> As the feature name table can be quite large (over 9k if all 64 bits
> of all three feature fields have names; a mere 8 features leaves only
> 8 bytes for a backing file name in a 512-byte cluster), it is unwise
> to emit this optional header
31.01.2020 20:44, Eric Blake wrote:
As the feature name table can be quite large (over 9k if all 64 bits
of all three feature fields have names; a mere 8 features leaves only
8 bytes for a backing file name in a 512-byte cluster), it is unwise
to emit this optional header in images with small clu
As the feature name table can be quite large (over 9k if all 64 bits
of all three feature fields have names; a mere 8 features leaves only
8 bytes for a backing file name in a 512-byte cluster), it is unwise
to emit this optional header in images with small cluster sizes.
Update iotest 036 to skip
