On 21/11/2019 14.11, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/21/19 1:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
>>> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
[...]
>>> +memset(env, 0, offsetof(CPUS39
On 11/21/19 1:53 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
>> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 3 +
>> target/s39
On 20/11/2019 12.43, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 3 +
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 111 -
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:32:38 +0100
Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 11/21/19 12:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:20 -0500
> > Janosch Frank wrote:
> >
> >> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
> >> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
On 11/21/19 12:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:20 -0500
> Janosch Frank wrote:
>
>> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
>> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
>
> Doing that makes sense.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
>> --
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:20 -0500
Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
> use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
Doing that makes sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 3 +
> target/s390x/cpu
Let's move the resets into one function and switch by type, so we can
use fallthroughs for shared reset actions.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 3 +
target/s390x/cpu.c | 111 -
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 62 dele
