Karim Taha writes:
> I made a fork on gitlab and pushed a branch at
> https://gitlab.com/Kariiem/qemu/-/tree/gsoc23-task3/ .
OK so I can see the original commits are not following the correct form
so this wasn't introduced by the tool send the emails. As Daniel
mentioned previously the format
I made a fork on gitlab and pushed a branch at
https://gitlab.com/Kariiem/qemu/-/tree/gsoc23-task3/ .
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 1:18 AM Warner Losh wrote:
> Usually this means pushing a branch off of mastar to a service like github
> or gitlab, and then
> posting a URL with where to get it.
>
> Wa
It was sent with git-publish, what do you mean by pointing to a branch?
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 7:22 PM Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Karim Taha writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:22:45AM +0200, Karim Taha wrote:
> > > From:
Karim Taha writes:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:22:45AM +0200, Karim Taha wrote:
> > From: Warner Losh
> >
> > Allow guest_base to be initialized on 64-bit hosts, the initial value is
> used by g2h_untagged function
> def
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:22:45AM +0200, Karim Taha wrote:
> > From: Warner Losh
> >
> > Allow guest_base to be initialized on 64-bit hosts, the initial value is
> used by g2h_untagged function defined in include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
>
> Th
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 07:22:45AM +0200, Karim Taha wrote:
> From: Warner Losh
>
> Allow guest_base to be initialized on 64-bit hosts, the initial value is used
> by g2h_untagged function defined in include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
This commit message is all incorrectly structured I'm afraid.
There ne
From: Warner Losh
Allow guest_base to be initialized on 64-bit hosts, the initial value is used
by g2h_untagged function defined in include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
---
bsd-user/main.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bsd-user/main.c b/bsd-user/main.c
